Tuesday, June 22, 2010

A Question of



Sacrifice one to save many? WEAK
Assist in ending a beloved family member's suffering by helping to extinguish their life? DOUBLE WEAK

There is only one true Question of Ethics:

Pizza or Mac and Cheese?

A MORAL QUANDARY.

Download on iTunes or find us here

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

The What If Game



What if the moon was made of cheese? THEN I'D EAT THAT BITCH

What if your mom wasn't so loose? THEN I WOULDN'T HAVE GOTTEN LAID LAST NIGHT

JUST KIDDING! It was your dad.

Download on iTunes or find us here

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Summer Report Card

If there are so many new releases vying for your attention that you can't choose which to see, maybe you should rely on movie posters to make your decision. If you're too overwhelmed or lazy to even do that, you could always just use my decisions to make your decisions. Or use a dart board or one of those nerdy dice with a billion sides. Hey, whatever works for you.

1. Killers (opens June 4)
PhotobucketThis movie has gotten lukewarm early press, and I'm going to have to give a lukewarm response to its poster as well. Katherine Heigl and Ashton Kutcher are both pretty, of course, so it has that going for it-- but I'm fairly certain that's what it's banking on to sell the movie. From what I can tell from the poster, I guess they're married? And want to kill... each other? Or the dude hiding at the weird bottom of the poster wants to kill them? Or Ashton Kutcher wants to kill himself because Katherine Heigl won't stop whining about how she misses being on Grey's Anatomy? I don't know. The pink text and the cast itself indiciates to me that they're trying to sell it to the ladies, but I think they're also hoping that the guns and intrigue will sell it to the dudes as well. Good luck with that. I think most guys know better than to see Katherine Heigl movies by now. C

2. Marmaduke (opens June 4)
PhotobucketThis is a movie now? Really? I suppose I'm not surprised. I have a very strong prejudice against movies starring animals whose mouths move when they talk (oh, how I long for the salad days of Homeward Bound, when all movie animals just read each others' minds), so I'll probably pass regardless of the poster. But let's focus. LIVE LARGE. Get it?? Because Marmaduke is giant? And apparently he can drive a car. Or maybe he's just riding along; it's hard to tell. And he's wearing sunglasses, see, because Marmaduke gets treated like a human. I'm not sure if the movie will be full of the kind of lame jokes of the comic strip, or the kind of equally lame but more fart-oriented jokes of modern talking animal movies, but I will not be seeing it and you probably shouldn't either. Instead, go read all the Marmaduke Explained archives. They're hilarious. C-

3. The A-Team (opens June 11)
PhotobucketI will preface this with the fact that I don't know anything about the A-Team. Is that with Mr. T? Who pities fools? I don't know. In any case, I kind of dig this poster. It sort of looks like it was slapped together in 15 minutes, but maybe that's the look they're going for-- ridiculous and devil-may-care. Or something. In any case, Bradley Cooper has pretty, pretty blue eyes, and I like the juxtaposition of all the faces. Still probably won't see it, but I dig it well enough. B+

4. The Karate Kid (opens June 11)
PhotobucketNow this I like. It's a clean design and the colors pop. There's no pretty, airbrushed woman smiling coyly with one leg in the air like in way too many movie posters (though in this case, who would that be? Jackie Chan?) And I like how Jaden Smith isn't in TOTAL sillhouette, but you can still make out his face. In any case, this is just visually appealing to me and I will probably see the movie. Though I think I would anyway, so maybe these posters actually have little or no bearing on my actions. Alas. A-

5. The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (opens June 30)
PhotobucketHeh. If tradition holds, I'll be seeing this one opening night at midnight with a lot of beer on hand, regardless of its poster. True to form, it's another Twilight poster that takes the love triangle angle and makes everybody's face look so shiny and smooth that it's almost creepy. But they're selling to little girls (and lonely moms, of course), so the romance aspect is what they want to play up. But make no mistakes-- vampires get their heads viciously ripped off by other vampires in this movie. If I had any faith left in anyone involved in the franchise, there could be some really cool stuff going on in the climax scenes. But regardless, the poster: eh. I don't think there's a person in America who is or isn't going to see this movie based on what the poster looks like. So I grade it moot.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Grab Bag!



Hey Mr. Brojangles! Get your hand in the bag! DO IT!!! Grab something and pull it out! What's that? You got a werewolf? Well maybe you should shoot it with a silver bullet. You don't have one? Well maybe you should have thought about that before you put your hand in this hawt grab bag. Idiot.

Download on iTunes or here.

Tuesday, May 25, 2010

You Know What I Hate?



Water levels in Mario. They are inevitably in every Mario game. They've been there since the beginning.



Things got even worse when Mario made the transition to 3D.



In 2D, you are defenseless unless you have a fireflower. In 3D, you are defenseless (maybe you can punch?). In both cases, the levels are slow, tedious, and sometimes Mario is difficult to control. The control issues are especially nerve-racking in the 3D Mario games.

I don't intend to say too much other than FUCK YOU UNDERWATER MARIO LEVELS.

I recently picked up Super Mario Galaxy 2, and I can already tell you I will hate the water stages. What do you guys think?

Monday, May 17, 2010

How to be Too Cool for School aka Get to Know TT.TKO.



Please have a freezer or better yet a glacier prepared to prevent face melting from the amount of pure awesome that will be coming at you. Seriously, this kind of face melting awesomeness hasn't been seen since those dumb nazi guys got dominated at the end of Raiders of the Lost Ark (this is why I always keep my eyes closed when opening presents).

We answer your questions, our own questions and better yet James Lipton's questions.

Download on iTunes or find it here

Sunday, May 16, 2010

Better Living Through Television


How do you take your TV? It was only a few years ago that the only option was to watch a show week to week, setting your VCR when you weren't going to be home, or hoping to catch reruns during summer hiatus. Now thanks to the rise of TV-on-DVD and websites like Hulu (not to mention the fact that you can find a torrent of almost any TV show ever made), it's easier than ever to be a television fan, a completist, a purist. I am all of these things. If I miss an episode of a show I'm a fan of, I won't watch subsequent episodes until I'm caught up. This separates me from the ranks of the casual TV viewers, and probably irritates my roommates, as our DVR fills up with episode after episode of 30 Rock, just because I missed the third show of the season.

But what's the ideal way to view a season of television, anyway? Watching it week to week has its merits: the anticipation builds, and you get seven days to mull over details and wonder where plotlines are headed. And don't forget the fact that week-to-week is how television is intended to be watched-- the writers plan storylines around hiatuses and sweeps months, and write cliffhangers specifically to build up that anticipation and create suspense.

But it's sometimes so nice to have an unwatched, pristine season of television waiting for you in your Netflix queue, or on a borrowed DVD set. You can lose track of the hours as you watch episode after episode. If one is less than stellar? Who cares! It's not like you waited longer to watch it than the time it took to change the disc. You can forgive a lot more flaws if you view something all in one go, which means you might be left with a better impression of a show. Case in point: Veronica Mars season 3, generally hated by fans, wasn't so bad for me when I watched it in one two-day bender. It's not the best season of television ever, and it pales in comparison to the near-flawless season 1, but I still generally enjoy it. Had I watched it week by week when it was still on the air, I might not feel so generous.

But still I'm torn. Friday Night Lights (the other best-show-you've-probably-never-seen) has just returned to NBC's lineup. The entire fourth season already aired on DirecTV, thanks to a dual-sponsorship situation, so I could easily torrent all the episodes and devour them at once. I even started to-- I watched the first three or four earlier this spring on my computer. But then I decided that maybe such a high-quality show deserves to be watched as intended. My plan is to view it weekly, savoring both the episodes and the in-between. Maybe that's the way television should be watched.

But more likely, I'll let the shows pile up on my DVR and stay up 'til 6 a.m. one night late in the season, each time promising myself just one...more...episode before sleep. Will I enjoy it any less? Probably not. But then, it's Friday Night Lights. Clear eyes; full hearts; can't lose.

Any arguments either way? I suppose the only conclusion I've reached for myself is that I love really excellent TV, and I'll take it however I can get it. Is there a right way and a wrong way to watch TV for you?