Sunday, August 15, 2010

Spooky Action at a Distance



You know what I don't get? Quantum entanglement.

Okay, sure, lots of people don't. Quantum mechanics in general is just a clusterfuck of physics nonsense to most people, probably. But I consider myself reasonably open to quantum ideas, whether or not I truly understand them.... but quantum entanglement is just fucking weird.



This is the description from Wikipedia:

Quantum entanglement, also called the quantum non-local connection, is a property of the quantum mechanical state of a system containing two or more objects, where the objects that make up the system are linked in a way such that one cannot adequately describe the quantum state of a constituent of the system without full mention of its counterparts, even if the individual objects are spatially separated.



Buuuh, let's rephrase that a little. If two particles are entangled, measuring the state of one particle, whatever that means, tells you what the result of measuring the state of the other particle will be, and it doesn't matter when or where the measurement is taken.

This is the easiest way I have ever been able to think of it: If two children are on a see-saw -- even if it's a thousand miles long -- you know that if one kid is down, the other has to be up. But no communication has to occur between the children for this to be the case; they are still connected and act as one single system. The concept of quantum entanglement is one of the reasons Einstein began to dislike quantum theory (as it was formulated), and he derisively referred to it as "spooky action at a distance."



Here's the kicker: entanglement occurs at roughly 10,000 times the speed of light. And that's a lower bound.




(The above article does a decent job explaining a little more of why entanglement is so damn weird, so I recommend reading it over. It's short, don't worry.)

Monday, July 12, 2010

Im no dunrlk

you are suht up

i mad podcast and lsiten nto it on ituns o here




Monday, July 5, 2010

Glued To The TV

Picture this. It's a Sunday afternoon, and you've got very important Sunday afternoon business to attend to: the laundry needs doing; you want to make it to the gym; the cat needs to be fed. But first, why not watch a little bit of TV? A half hour couldn't hurt.

PhotobucketBut then you're flipping channels, and you come across That Movie. You know the one. The one that means you won't be flipping any further, because you can't help but watch this film even though you've seen it so many times before. 1000 Awesome Things calls them "glue movies." I call them time sucks.

My friend Sara and I were talking about these kinds of movies the other day, and agreed that as females, we simply can't help but watch everytime the Amanda Bynes classic, 'What A Girl Wants,' is shown on Oxygen or USA or whatever channel shows sort of lame girly movies. PhotobucketI don't think we're alone in this boat-- I know I've seen friends' statuses on Facebook before about watching this movie, and they surely didn't seek it out. It was on, and we're contractually obligated to watch it. We just settle in for the next couple hours and feel thankful it's not an America's Next Top Model marathon. We could lose a whole day on that one.

On a less girly note, I find myself utterly incapable of changing the channel whenever any of the Mighty Ducks movies are on. And that includes the third one-- that's how deep this river runs. Maybe it's Joshua Jackson's dreamy influence, but regardless, I have no control. PhotobucketThe laundry remains dirty. The gym remains empty. The cat goes hungry (but I don't have a cat, so that's not, in fact, cruelty to animals, and is, in fact, proof that I'm not insane, because how crazy would it be to feed an imaginary cat? I mean, really).

What movie is like this for you? I bet it's something lame; these kinds of films aren't usually works of cinematic genius. But it's okay to admit it. After all, I've spent multiple hours of my life watching Amanda Bynes fall down a lot. There's no shame here.

Tuesday, June 22, 2010

A Question of



Sacrifice one to save many? WEAK
Assist in ending a beloved family member's suffering by helping to extinguish their life? DOUBLE WEAK

There is only one true Question of Ethics:

Pizza or Mac and Cheese?

A MORAL QUANDARY.

Download on iTunes or find us here

Wednesday, June 9, 2010

The What If Game



What if the moon was made of cheese? THEN I'D EAT THAT BITCH

What if your mom wasn't so loose? THEN I WOULDN'T HAVE GOTTEN LAID LAST NIGHT

JUST KIDDING! It was your dad.

Download on iTunes or find us here

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Summer Report Card

If there are so many new releases vying for your attention that you can't choose which to see, maybe you should rely on movie posters to make your decision. If you're too overwhelmed or lazy to even do that, you could always just use my decisions to make your decisions. Or use a dart board or one of those nerdy dice with a billion sides. Hey, whatever works for you.

1. Killers (opens June 4)
PhotobucketThis movie has gotten lukewarm early press, and I'm going to have to give a lukewarm response to its poster as well. Katherine Heigl and Ashton Kutcher are both pretty, of course, so it has that going for it-- but I'm fairly certain that's what it's banking on to sell the movie. From what I can tell from the poster, I guess they're married? And want to kill... each other? Or the dude hiding at the weird bottom of the poster wants to kill them? Or Ashton Kutcher wants to kill himself because Katherine Heigl won't stop whining about how she misses being on Grey's Anatomy? I don't know. The pink text and the cast itself indiciates to me that they're trying to sell it to the ladies, but I think they're also hoping that the guns and intrigue will sell it to the dudes as well. Good luck with that. I think most guys know better than to see Katherine Heigl movies by now. C

2. Marmaduke (opens June 4)
PhotobucketThis is a movie now? Really? I suppose I'm not surprised. I have a very strong prejudice against movies starring animals whose mouths move when they talk (oh, how I long for the salad days of Homeward Bound, when all movie animals just read each others' minds), so I'll probably pass regardless of the poster. But let's focus. LIVE LARGE. Get it?? Because Marmaduke is giant? And apparently he can drive a car. Or maybe he's just riding along; it's hard to tell. And he's wearing sunglasses, see, because Marmaduke gets treated like a human. I'm not sure if the movie will be full of the kind of lame jokes of the comic strip, or the kind of equally lame but more fart-oriented jokes of modern talking animal movies, but I will not be seeing it and you probably shouldn't either. Instead, go read all the Marmaduke Explained archives. They're hilarious. C-

3. The A-Team (opens June 11)
PhotobucketI will preface this with the fact that I don't know anything about the A-Team. Is that with Mr. T? Who pities fools? I don't know. In any case, I kind of dig this poster. It sort of looks like it was slapped together in 15 minutes, but maybe that's the look they're going for-- ridiculous and devil-may-care. Or something. In any case, Bradley Cooper has pretty, pretty blue eyes, and I like the juxtaposition of all the faces. Still probably won't see it, but I dig it well enough. B+

4. The Karate Kid (opens June 11)
PhotobucketNow this I like. It's a clean design and the colors pop. There's no pretty, airbrushed woman smiling coyly with one leg in the air like in way too many movie posters (though in this case, who would that be? Jackie Chan?) And I like how Jaden Smith isn't in TOTAL sillhouette, but you can still make out his face. In any case, this is just visually appealing to me and I will probably see the movie. Though I think I would anyway, so maybe these posters actually have little or no bearing on my actions. Alas. A-

5. The Twilight Saga: Eclipse (opens June 30)
PhotobucketHeh. If tradition holds, I'll be seeing this one opening night at midnight with a lot of beer on hand, regardless of its poster. True to form, it's another Twilight poster that takes the love triangle angle and makes everybody's face look so shiny and smooth that it's almost creepy. But they're selling to little girls (and lonely moms, of course), so the romance aspect is what they want to play up. But make no mistakes-- vampires get their heads viciously ripped off by other vampires in this movie. If I had any faith left in anyone involved in the franchise, there could be some really cool stuff going on in the climax scenes. But regardless, the poster: eh. I don't think there's a person in America who is or isn't going to see this movie based on what the poster looks like. So I grade it moot.

Wednesday, June 2, 2010

Grab Bag!



Hey Mr. Brojangles! Get your hand in the bag! DO IT!!! Grab something and pull it out! What's that? You got a werewolf? Well maybe you should shoot it with a silver bullet. You don't have one? Well maybe you should have thought about that before you put your hand in this hawt grab bag. Idiot.

Download on iTunes or here.